Trust review clinic
An evidence gap turned into a test for Session 4.
Learn to turn a vague trust concern into one explicit evidence gap and expected test result.
Bring your AI Operating Charter and Day 1 evidence. AI/GPT is not required for the core peer clinic.
Exchange provisional charters, challenge one trust claim, ownership gap and permission assumption, then define the most consequential test.
A challenged assumption, expected behaviour and test case ready for Session 4.
The studio card is your own record. It is not a prompt to paste into AI.
What tonight is for
An evidence gap turned into a test for Session 4. This facilitated studio is part of the 3-day, 2-night programme. Use your existing work; no new technical setup is required.
Your task
Exchange provisional charters. Your partner challenges one trust claim, one absent owner and one permission assumption. Choose the most consequential gap and write an expected test result before seeing the outcome.
Use the starter packet if you do not have an own-work example.
| Minutes | Activity |
|---|---|
| 0–5 | Choose one gap |
| 5–15 | Inspect the existing evidence |
| 15–35 | Peer clinic: try the card and ask for missing information |
| 35–50 | Revise one item |
| 50–60 | Save and write the next-morning question |
Keep: Provisional decision → challenged assumption → expected behaviour → test case.
Save your studio card
RUN AI — NIGHT 1 My question or gap: Existing evidence / source: Partner’s challenge: My correction: What the correction proves: What remains unknown: Question for tomorrow: Evidence route: designed / simulated / inspected supplied output / independently executed and checked
If you missed the studio, complete one correction using the supplied example and bring this card to the ten-minute morning reconnect. Return to the course map.