YOUR AI WORK PLAYBOOK.
Keep your question, working method and checked outputs together. Edit the cards, save on this device, download or print. Your answers are not sent to the trainer.
8 session cards + final proofUse this workbook to record your question, decisions, evidence and reusable methods across Work with AI.
No AI is required to fill in this page. Bring your own notes. AI/GPT is only needed when a session explicitly marks an activity as a Prompting exercise.
Write in the cards as you progress. Save on this device, copy, print or download your notes.
Your Personal AI Work Playbook: opening question, reusable method, eight session records and final proof.
Workbook cards are notes and records. Do not paste an entire card into AI unless a specific session tells you to.
DON'T COLLECT PROMPTS. COLLECT WORKING METHODS.
Each card captures something worth reusing. By Session 8, the cards become evidence of how you direct, ground, inspect, create and repeat AI-assisted work while keeping human judgement visible.
Start with your question
MY QUESTION Course / date: My work or curiosity: My priority question: My route: own work / help choosing / starter case A useful result would be: Experience / access help needed: RETURN TO MY QUESTION Status: answered / demonstrated / needs more evidence / outside this course I came in asking: My answer now: The output, decision or evidence that changed my view: What I still need to find out, and how: My next small application: Optional next-week check: new input / what held / what changed
My reusable method
MY REUSABLE METHOD Task and intended receiver: Useful result and human boundary: Baseline output or prepared example used: Facts, sources and applicable dates: Brief / prompt / working steps: One targeted follow-up and what it improved: Output to keep (paste or identify the file): Important claim / exact source passage or calculation / limitation: Checks: facts / audience / format / promises / human review New input used for the second run: Second-run result and what changed in the method: Evidence type: guided inspection / independent tool use Question status and next application:
See a completed fictional example
- Question: Can AI help me reply faster without inventing a promise?
- Task: Prepare Q-104 for Aina; human checks and sends.
- Sources: P-SEP: notebook RM8.00; POL-SEP: postcode/stock required; no automatic discount authority.
- Method: Paste enquiry and current sources; request concise draft, subtotal and missing facts; ask a follow-up to remove unsupported promises.
- Output: Reply B in S4. Check: 500 × RM8.00 = RM4,000; no confirmed delivery, discount or order.
- Second run: Q-105: 300 × RM2.50 = RM750, stock/pickup date still unconfirmed. Ask Operations to confirm; do not reuse Q-104's quantity or delivery wording.
- Evidence: Guided comparison of prepared text, unless the learner actually runs the prompt. Next: try one new shareable customer draft and check it.
Discover What AI Can Do With Your Work
ANCHOR TASK I need to ___________________________________________. A good outcome would be ______________________________. Today I usually do it by _____________________________. The main friction is _________________________________. BASELINE Input route: own work / starter case Evidence: guided inspection / independent tool use Important claim and the source/value I checked: What remains unknown: Useful: /5 Ready to use: /5 Corrections needed: ________________________________ Confidence in result: /5 Time / effort: ________________________________ SIX WAYS AI CAN HELP [ ] Explain [ ] Generate [ ] Transform [ ] Analyse [ ] Evaluate [ ] Explore Three demonstrated or useful AI jobs (practise at least one additional role): 1. ___________________________________________________ 2. ___________________________________________________ 3. ___________________________________________________ AI FIT / HUMAN BOUNDARY Choose one: [ ] Yes, as described [ ] Yes, but only with conditions [ ] No — keep it human-led / use a simpler method [ ] Not enough information AI may: ______________________________________________________ Human must: ______________________________________________________ Stop / escalate if: ______________________________________________________ The AI use I had overlooked was: ______________________________________________________ RETURN TO MY QUESTION Status: answered / demonstrated / needs more evidence / outside this course Evidence or gap: Next application:
Brief & Steer AI for Better Results
ANCHOR TASK ______________________________________________________ NORMAL INSTRUCTION I USED ______________________________________________________ FIVE-PART BRIEF Outcome: ______________________________________________________ Situation: ______________________________________________________ Material: ______________________________________________________ Boundary: ______________________________________________________ Deliverable: ______________________________________________________ STEERING MOVE USED [ ] Question it [ ] Challenge it [ ] Improve it What changed? ______________________________________________________ INTERACTION MODE [ ] Answer me [ ] Think with me [ ] Challenge me [ ] Interview me Why this mode? ______________________________________________________ What still needs human judgement? ______________________________________________________ PROOF One ambiguity removed: ______________________________________________________ One better result: ______________________________________________________ RETURN TO MY QUESTION Status: answered / demonstrated / needs more evidence / outside this course Evidence or gap: Next application:
Work With Context, Files & Sources
ANCHOR TASK ______________________________________________________ CONTEXT PACK Task: ______________________________________________________ Facts needed: ______________________________________________________ Source material: ______________________________________________________ Examples to imitate: ______________________________________________________ Rules to obey: ______________________________________________________ Ignore: ______________________________________________________ Unknown: ______________________________________________________ SOURCE-OF-TRUTH RULE For fact ______________________, trust ______________________ because _________________________________________________. Do not trust __________________ because ____________________. EVIDENCE PATTERN Mark claims as: SUPPORTED / INFERENCE / CONFLICT / UNKNOWN One claim I checked: ______________________________________________________ PROOF What changed after grounding? ______________________________________________________ RETURN TO MY QUESTION Status: answered / demonstrated / needs more evidence / outside this course Evidence or gap: Next application:
Analyse, Compare & Audit Consistently
ANALYSIS CARD Question: ______________________________________________________ Evidence: ______________________________________________________ Scope included / excluded: ______________________________________________________ Criteria: ______________________________________________________ COMPARISON RUBRIC Option A: __________________ Option B: __________________ Criterion 1: _______________ Evidence: __________________ Criterion 2: _______________ Evidence: __________________ Criterion 3: _______________ Evidence: __________________ AUDIT CHECKLIST Gap found: ______________________________________________________ Contradiction: ______________________________________________________ Unsupported claim: ______________________________________________________ Fix needed: ______________________________________________________ PROOF One issue detected using an explicit criterion: ______________________________________________________ RETURN TO MY QUESTION Status: answered / demonstrated / needs more evidence / outside this course Evidence or gap: Next application:
Write, Transform & Communicate
FACT PACK Confirmed facts: ______________________________________________________ Source notes: ______________________________________________________ Missing facts: ______________________________________________________ Cannot promise: ______________________________________________________ Receiver: ______________________________________________________ Tone: ______________________________________________________ AUDIENCE TRANSFORM Audience 1: __________________ Purpose: __________________ Audience 2: __________________ Purpose: __________________ What changed? ______________________________________________________ What stayed fixed? ______________________________________________________ RECEIVER TEST Purpose / Information / Tone / Risk / Action Weakest item: ______________________________________________________ Receiver-driven edit: ______________________________________________________ PROOF One fact protected from invention: ______________________________________________________ RETURN TO MY QUESTION Status: answered / demonstrated / needs more evidence / outside this course Evidence or gap: Next application:
Think, Brainstorm & Challenge
DIVERGENCE LENSES Lens 1: __________________ Option: ______________________ Lens 2: __________________ Option: ______________________ Lens 3: __________________ Option: ______________________ Lens 4: __________________ Option: ______________________ TRADE-OFF MATRIX Objective: ______________________________________________________ Option chosen for test: ______________________________________________________ Trade-off discovered: ______________________________________________________ Uncertainty that matters: ______________________________________________________ CHALLENGE / PRE-MORTEM If this fails, likely reason: ______________________________________________________ Hidden assumption: ______________________________________________________ Missing evidence: ______________________________________________________ Revision after challenge: ______________________________________________________ PROOF One decision improved by the challenge: ______________________________________________________ RETURN TO MY QUESTION Status: answered / demonstrated / needs more evidence / outside this course Evidence or gap: Next application:
Create & Work Multimodally
CREATE-4 MAKE: ______________________________________________________ FOR: ______________________________________________________ KNOW: ______________________________________________________ GOOD: ______________________________________________________ FIXED / VARIABLE SPEC FIXED — must not change: ______________________________________________________ VARIABLE — may adapt: ______________________________________________________ REFERENCE — follow: ______________________________________________________ HARD CONSTRAINT — never violate: ______________________________________________________ QUALITY GATES FACT: PASS / FAIL FIT: PASS / FAIL FORMAT: PASS / FAIL CONSISTENCY: PASS / FAIL FUNCTION: PASS / FAIL Second run result: ______________________________________________________ PROOF One fixed element preserved: ______________________________________________________ RETURN TO MY QUESTION Status: answered / demonstrated / needs more evidence / outside this course Evidence or gap: Next application:
Turn Good AI Use Into a Repeatable Work System
AI WORK PATTERN WHEN: ______________________________________________________ INPUT: ______________________________________________________ AI JOB: ______________________________________________________ OUTPUT: ______________________________________________________ CHECK: ______________________________________________________ HUMAN: ______________________________________________________ SECOND-RUN REVISION RECORD What drifted? ______________________________________________________ What failed? ______________________________________________________ What instruction / check was added? ______________________________________________________ What remains human? ______________________________________________________ Playbook section to keep this under: ______________________________________________________ PROOF Could another person repeat the method without reading your chat? YES / NO What would they still need? ______________________________________________________ RETURN TO MY QUESTION Status: answered / demonstrated / needs more evidence / outside this course Evidence or gap: Next application:
FINAL PROOF RECORD
FINAL PROOF RECORD · WORK WITH AI ANCHOR TASK ______________________________________________________ BEFORE Normal method used: ______________________________________________________ Original output weakness: ______________________________________________________ Score: Usefulness ___/5 Ready ___/5 Confidence ___/5 AFTER Improved method used: ______________________________________________________ Evidence of improvement: ______________________________________________________ Score: Usefulness ___/5 Ready ___/5 Confidence ___/5 SECOND RUN New input used: ______________________________________________________ Did the method survive? YES / NO What drifted? ______________________________________________________ What stayed fixed? ______________________________________________________ HUMAN BOUNDARY AI may: ______________________________________________________ Human must: ______________________________________________________ Stop if: ______________________________________________________ NEXT MOVE The next AI capability I want to strengthen is: ______________________________________________________